Playoff Picks: Super Bowl

31. January 2009  - Published by Dan Clasgens

The NFL season officially ends on Sunday as the Cardinals and Steelers tangle in Tampa for Super Bowl XLIII. The growing consensus seems to favor the Steelers, and for good reason. Still, I see it being a close game. Here's how I see things unfolding.

Pittsburgh no doubt has a tenacious defense. They blitz as good as any team in football and have the speed at linebackers to force the issue. Defenisve coordinator Dick LeBeau is going to have something up his sleeve with two weeks to prepare. 

Arizona's offense is going to be up for the challenge though. Kurt Warner is amongst the best in the league at passing under pressure and Larry Fitzgerald is having one of the greatest playoff runs ever. The team has found a way to keeps things just off-balanced enough by usinig the running game effectively.

I expect both units to make plays in this game and to force the issue. I do not see a scenario where Arizona is kept off the scoreboard like many are suggesting.

The game ultimately is going to come down to what happens on special teams and the other side of the ball. The Cardinals' defense has been highly overlooked for their stellar play during their improbable run. They bent, but did not break against the Eagles and made big plays all game long. That came on the heels of them shutting down the high-powered Panthers and Falcons' running attacks. For the most part they contained the big-play wideouts (Roddy White and Steve Smith) and more importantly helped the offense out by providing good field position.

Ben Roethlisberger is more than healthy enough to play this game and has acheived despite playing behind an average offensive line. Santonio Holmes is the team's biggest weapon in the passing game and will need to break a few plays to loosen things up for the running game. Willie Parker is going to be the difference though. Finally, he's 100% and I forsee him being a problem for the Cardinals' defense.

Both teams have had good play from their special teams, but one mistake could alter the outcome of this game.

Weather will not be on the Steelers' side. After playing most of the past month plus in frigid conditions and in their home stadium, they travel to Tampa. They should have a bigger crowd though, which could prove to be a factor.

MY PICK AND WHY: STEELERS 24, CARDINALS 20 - I see the game going either way and feel that the Cardinals will have a chance late in the fourth quarter. I like the fact that the Cards' coaching staff is so familiar with the Steelers even if Ken Whisenhunt doesn't see it. Still, Pittsburgh has proved to me all season that they can win the big game. It hasn't always been pretty, but they typically get the job done in the end as the 14-4 record would indicate. The Cardinals have never been here before, but Kurt Warner has. With two weeks of rest and the focus on Larry Fitzgerald, I expect Anquan Boldin to be the potential X-factor to keeping the Cards in it. The Steelers have more "big game experience" this year and have excelled in the fourth quarter. Even if the Cards have the lead, they struggle to grind it out and will do so badly against Pittsburgh. Look for the Cards to stay with the Steelers, but fade late as Pittsburgh gets their sixth title.

MVP PICKS - Willie Parker (my pick); Kurt Warner (if Cards pull it out)

MY BEST BETS (based off $100) - For Amusement Only ;-)
$50 - Cardinals +6.5
$20 - Parlay Cardinals +6.5/Under 47 (don't love the under)
$20 - Money Line Cardinals +195 (just in case they pull it off - they have to win, but you get $19.50 for every $10 bet)
$10 - Willie Parker to win MVP (+550) - $10 gets back $55

SUPER LINKS
--UTLIMATE SUPERBOWL PARTY PROP GAME (Bodog.com)
--COMPLETE MAN COVERAGE OF SUPER BOWL (AskMen.com)
--LATEST VEGAS ODDS (VegasInsider.com)
--
SUPER BOWL XLIII PROP BETS (VegasInsider.com)
--MOCK CELEBRITY SUPER BOWL PICKS (HolyTaco.com)
--FLASHBACK: FAVORITE SUPER BOWL COMMERCIALS (from GetSportsInfo.com)
--HOMETOWN HOTTIES: PITTSBURGH VS. ARIZONA (from Maxim.com)

NFL , , ,

Hot Stove Talk: Manny In Limbo

31. January 2009  - Published by Dan Clasgens

Here are some of the latest headlines from around the MLB Hot Stove to heat you up:

DODGERS STILL WAITING FOR MANNY (ESPN.com)
The Dodgers made a $45 million offer to Ramirez in November and then withdrew it when Boras did not respond, and then the Dodgers made an offer of arbitration, and again, Boras did not respond, according to L.A. officials. So the Dodgers have sat back and waited for any other serious bidder for Ramirez to emerge, waited to see if there was any reason to extend their own offer...MORE

VARITEK STAYING IN BOSTON (Boston Globe)
The captain is not going anywhere. Ending a three-month saga hours before a team-imposed deadline, the Red Sox and catcher Jason Varitek agreed to a one-year contract with a team option for 2010, two sources with knowledge of the deal confirmed yesterday. Varitek, who turns 37 in April, will receive $5 million in 2009. The Sox hold a $5 million option for 2010...MORE

SHEETS RUNNING OUT OF OPTIONS (MLB.com)
Ben Sheets and the Brewers have not spoken since the Brewers asked whether Sheets would consider an incentive-based contract similar to John Smoltz's ($4.5MM in incentives) or Brad Penny's ($3MM in incentives). It appears that Sheets was not open to an similar offer, but the Brewers won't offer a multi-year deal. GM Doug Melvin maintains the club isn't likely to sign Sheets, but he hasn't completely ruled out the possibility...MORE

CUBS SHOPPING HILL (Baltimore Sun)
The Orioles and Chicago Cubs are again involved in trade talks, this time about Cubs left-handed starting pitcher Rich Hill. According to industry sources, the teams have had talks about Hill, a one-time top prospect who is struggling to regain his command. Tne industry source said it's a "strong possibility" that Hill will wind up with the Orioles, perhaps as early as next week. The Orioles will likely give up a player to be named, who could be contingent on Hill's success in Baltimore...MORE

IT'S OFFICIAL, CUBS ADD BAKO (Cubs.com)
The Cubs signed catcher Paul Bako, who had been with the Reds, to a one-year, $725,000 contract. The deal was done a month ago, but Bako had to wait for the Cubs to open a roster spot before it was made official. Bako was no longer a fit for Cincinnati with the emergence of Ryan Hanigan and following the trade for veteran Ramon Hernandez...MORE

FOGG LANDS IN COLORADO (ColoradoRockies.com)
Rockies signed RHP Josh Fogg to a minor league contract and invited him to spring training. With Jeff Francis potentially starting the year on the DL, there could be room for Fogg at the back of the rotation. Fogg, 32, went 10-9 with a 4.94 ERA in 2007 and won several matchups with big-name pitchers. Fogg signed with the Reds last season and went 2-7 with a 7.58 ERA in 22 games, including 14 starts...MORE

MLB , , , , , , , , , , ,

UFC 94: St. Pierre vs. Penn 2

31. January 2009  - Published by Jeff Pugh

If you aren't a Mixed Martial Arts fan yet, do yourself a favor and watch tonight. You'll see two of the top 5 fighters in the world square off against one another tonight. Both fighters are in their prime and both are champions. B.J. Penn is attempting to become the first fighter in UFC history to hold two world titles at one time. He's already the lightweight champ (155 lbs.) and trying to become the welterweight champion (170 lbs.). This will be an epic fight and will most likely go down as one the best in the history of the UFC.

Welterweight champ Georges St. Pierre (17-2 MMA, 11-2 UFC) vs. Lightweight champ B.J. Penn (13-4-1 MMA, 9-3-1 UFC) - for Welterweight Championship

These two fought once before at UFC 58 with Georges pulling out the decision victory. It could have gone either way in the eyes of many, but St. Pierre proved to be in better shape than Penn, the one knock against him in his career. Penn decided to change his attitude toward fighting after his 28th birthday and rededicated himself to training and endurance. Since dropping down to lightweight, Penn has been unstoppable. He wants to avenge another loss on his record against St. Pierre, who himself is a much better fighter than the one at UFC 58.

(Prediction: B.J. Penn via submission, round 4)

Lyoto Machida (13-0 MMA, 5-0 UFC) vs. Thiago Silva (13-0 MMA, 4-0 UFC)

Two undefeated light heavyweights face off tonight before the main event. This matchup will likely set up one of these two fighters to be the next, next in line for the light heavyweight championship. Machida is a very talented, yet painstakingly boring fighter. That is the biggest con against him, but he is one hell of a fighter and deserves a chance at the title. Fans may not agree because he simply isn't flashy enough. He has victories over B.J. Penn and Rich Franklin. Silva on the other hand is very agressive, not wanting to let his opponents take the fight to a decision with 10 of his victories by knockout or TKO. Silva has victories over James Irvin and Houston Alexander.

(Prediction: Lyoto Machida via decision)

Karo Parisyan (18-5 MMA, 9-3 UFC) vs. Dong Hyun Kim (11-0-1 MMA, 2-0 UFC)

Parisyan is a judo black belt who has won eight of his past 10 fights, all but one going to the cards. Kim is also a judo black belt with a split-decision and TKO in his two UFC victories. Parisyan is likely the less talented of the two fighters, but his desire to re-establish himself in the top of his weight class could propel him to decision victory. But his inability to finish fights does leave the door open for Kim to take him out.

(Prediction: Kim via TKO, round 2)

Nate Diaz (10-2 MMA, 5-0 UFC) vs. Clay Guida (24-9 MMA, 5-3 UFC)

Diaz is the winner of the Ultimate Fighter 5 and is quickly becoming a force in the lightweight division. Guida is the gatekeeper to the division, putting on entertaining fights and likely launching the careers of those he faces to the next level. Diaz has great jiu jitsu skills and is improving as a striker. Guida will try to establish a hectic pace and get Diaz uncomfortable. Diaz will most likely get Guida down on the ground and submit him.

(Prediction: Diaz via submission, round 1)

Stephan Bonnar (11-4 MMA, 5-3 UFC) vs. Jon Jones (7-0 MMA, 1-0 UFC)

Bonnar is attempting to comeback after a serious knee injury that has kept him sidelined for 15 months. Bonnar is most famous for his Ultimate Fighter 1 finale with Forrest Griffin, but he's a serious fighter with serious skils when healthy. Great striker with solid muay thai and jiu jitsu, he should have the edge against Jones. Jones is a solid striker and wrestler, undefeated in MMA, but doesn't have the experience to match with Bonnar. If Bonnar is 100 percent, it's a victory for him.

(Prediction: Bonnar, 2nd round TKO)

UFC , ,

Flashback: GoDaddy.com Girl - Hearing

30. January 2009  - Published by Dan Clasgens
We continue to look back at the best Super Bowl commercials of all-time with the first ever GoDaddy.com girl...

Just For Fun ,

Cap Schmap

29. January 2009  - Published by Adam Bartel

A few weeks ago, Shawn Hoffman over at Baseball Prospectus wrote an excellent column that should be considered a must read for any proponent of a baseball salary cap.  In the article, he envisions what a salary cap might look like were one to be implemented, and examines two aspects that no one ever really talks about; a payroll floor, and the difference between local & national revenue.

A salary cap has to have a payroll floor; without it, there's no incentive for an owner with no interest in winning to do anything more than the bare minimum and walk away with a sizeable profit.  The floor usually is about 75% of the cap.  So, given Hoffman's calculations, a cap in 2009 terms would be about $103 million, with a floor of $77 million.  And here's where the problems start:

[F]ourteen teams would have been under the payroll floor, by a total of $251 million. Even discounting the Marlins' $22 million payroll, the other thirteen teams would have had to spend an average of $15 million more just to meet the minimum. Some of those teams might be able to afford it; most wouldn't...had our fictional cap/floor arrangement been instituted last year, the Pirates would have needed to increase their Opening Day payroll by $28 million. Not only would the team have taken a big loss, but Neal Huntington's long-term strategy would have been sabotaged, since the team would have had to sign a number of veterans just to meet the minimum payroll.

Not only would that cause immediate problems for smaller franchises, but the power of the big boys could wreak even more havoc for them down the road:

Now fast forward to 2009. Let's say the Pirates' sales staff runs into major headwinds, with the team struggling and the economy sinking. The team's top line takes a hit, falling $10 million from 2008. The Mets and Yankees, meanwhile, open their new ballparks, and each team increases its local revenue by $50 million. If the twenty-seven other teams are flat, total industry revenues rise by $90 million (not including any appreciation in national media revenue). Forty-five percent of that, of course, goes to the players. So even as the Pirates' purchasing power decreases, the payroll floor actually rises.

The local vs. national revenue argument is one that I don't think people fully appreciate.  Since the NFL derives so much of its income from their national TV contract, it's easy to spread that money evenly and hold the clubs accountable.  But when the Yankees rake in close to $100 million per year in local TV revenue, while smaller clubs struggle to break the $10 million barrier, that's a lot harder to place on an even scale.  I think the small market owners realize that, and that's why they haven't made a more unified push for a cap.

Even lowering the threshold of the luxury tax isn't going to help solve the problem.  Only the Yankees and Tigers exceeded the cap in 2008, and the Tigers just barely crossed the line.  The threshold is so high ($162 million) that it would have to be lowered significantly to have an effect on anyone other than the big 3-4 teams.  Even if you lowered the cap by $30 million, it would only cost the Yankees another $12 million to keep the same payroll.  Since Hank Steinbrenner is already used to paying out $25-30 million in luxury taxes, I doubt this would deter him.  Incidentally, luxury tax revenues do not actually go to the small market clubs; that happens through local revenue sharing, which is a smaller piece of the pie.

The one thing that people can take some solace in, as Hoffman concludes, is baseball's playoff system that evens the playing field greatly for the teams that make it to the post-season.  Consider that, since 1993, MLB has had 10 different World Series winners.  Compare that with an even more ruthlessly capitalistic league, like...say...the English Premier Football league, which has had a grand total of four winners over the same time period, and I think it's far more preferable to have a system like the current one that baseball does.  Besides, having the biggest payroll does not guarantee a winner; ask Hank Steinbrenner how that's worked out over the past eight years.

MLB , ,

DeCourcy: Felton's Firing "Repulsive"

29. January 2009  - Published by Dan Clasgens

Mike DeCourcy of the Sporting News hit the nail on the head when he sounded off on Georgia's firing of Dennis Felton:

You could say it was overdue, because he'd have been fired last March were it not for the Bulldogs' miraculous run through the SEC tournament and into the NCAAs.

And still, "repulsive" fits best because it's obvious Georgia fired Felton Thursday out of fear he'd somehow put together another March miracle and they'd be compelled to keep him another year.

When the colleges tell you -- and the government that might want to tax them -- that they're not running professional sports organizations, how are we supposed to take them seriously when they're firing coaches in midseason?

Felton and erstwhile Alabama coach Mark Gottfried were not accused of anything more untoward than losing too many games, and yet their universities found it necessary to chase them off-campus immediately. 

COMPLETE ARTILCE

College Hoops , , ,

60 Sexy Steeler Fans

28. January 2009  - Published by Dan Clasgens

I have made fun of them for years for not having cheerleaders, but COED Magazine has made me acknowledge they do have so sexy fans...



60 SEXY STEELER GIRLS (COED Magazine)

Just For Fun , ,

Xavier Has Outgrown A-10

28. January 2009  - Published by Greg Shoemaker
It has been 14 years since Xavier began play as a member of the Atlantic 10.  The Musketeers left now defunct Midwestern Collegiate Conference after 16 seasons.  The thought was that XU needed to play in a higher profile conference, one that was more competitive night in and night out.  The RPI was becoming a major factor in determining at-large bids for the NCAA tournament.  In the MCC it was rare that teams who did not win the conference tournament made it into the big dance.
 
The A-10 had a marquis coach and program in Jon Chaney and his Temple Owls as well as John Calipari and UMass.  The Musketeers were attracted to the idea of being able to recruit along the east coast.  After all, the league had teams in New York City, Philadelphia and Boston.  The league was at its height and was adding Xavier and Dayton in 1995-96.
 
Things have since changed for the once prolific A-10.  Temple and UMass have struggled to win consistently since the departures of their coaches.  The Musketeers and Flyers are now the elite of the A-10.
 
Xavier has compiled 154-59 record in A-10 play.  They have gone 21-9 in the league tournament.  Championships have piled up for Xavier since its inception winning six league titles and four tournament titles.  Their league winning percentage trails only Temple by .005 percent.  The Musketeers should be top dog by seasons end.
 
So has Xavier outgrown the A-10, absolutely not.  A major part of the Musketeers success has been able to recruit along the east coast.  The current roster includes Jason Love (Philadelphia), Terrell Holloway (NYC) and Jamel McLean (Hampton, VA).  There has been a steady flow of talent coming from their opponent’s own backyards.
 
Gonzaga has feasted and flourished playing in the weak West Coast Conference.  The Musketeers have taken a page out of the Zags book by playing a very challenging non-conference schedule.  The day the Musketeers can no longer play home and home series with the likes of a Virginia, Tennessee or Wisconsin then it may be time to move on.
 
Where would the Musketeers go?  There is no room for them, in the 16 team Big East Conference.  Chances are they would have to form a new league with teams from other conferences that are disgruntled with their current league situations.  Schools like Butler, Dayton, St. Louis and Valpo could be likely candidates to break away from their conferences.  That would mean a year or two without an automatic NCAA bid, a tough proposition for those schools defecting.

For the time being there should be no debate about where the Musketeers call home.  There are two adages that Xavier should adhere to if they were to contemplate a move.  One is you don’t mess with success and two the grass isn’t always greener on the other side of the tracks.  The A-10 is what it is and XU has found the right recipe for winning within the league.

College Hoops , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Reasons To Hate Xavier

28. January 2009  - Published by Jimmy Dinsmore

I saw this email that Lance posted on his blog and thought I'd post it here and give my take as this email epitomizes my dislike of Xavier basketball.

"The biggest reason there is no Xavier talk is that there is no controversy with Xavier.  The players act with class, the coach is as non-controversial as can be, they graduate, the AD is on the same page, and they play as a team.  What is there to discuss?"-From an emailer

Now, some will say, I just hate X because I went to UC and support them. That is partially true. I have a great deal of respect for Xavier's program and Sean Miller is a class act. Unquestionably their fans should be proud. But, it's these same prideful fans that make me always root against X. They have let their recent success go to their head. And, no matter what, they always feel it necessary to bring up Bob Huggins, horse punching, Donald Little, or UC's various other discretions of the PAST. They act as if their players are saintly and above all of that. Then, they also try to defend the A-10 as some  kind of power conference, when it is a mid-major program, with one good team. I heard one X blowhard arguing why a recruit  chose UK over Xavier and I laughed. Because UK is a big-time program, even at their worst. Xavier is not an elite program and are even second fiddle here in town (even when UC is down, UC is still top-dog).

In a national scope (which is what is important for college basketball), Xavier is a virtual unknown. Ask anyone outside of the the tri-state area where Xavier is located and they probably won't even know what Xavier is, and certainly won't know it's Cincinnati. The X fans are so narrow minded, and arrogant, that they cannot realize this or accept it. 

They should just accept it and watch their team play great basketball. But, their fans cannot follow the lead of their classy coach.

College Hoops , , , , ,

Flashback: Coke - Mean Joe Green

28. January 2009  - Published by Dan Clasgens

We can't look back at the best Super Bowl commercials of all-time w/out Mean Joe Green's Coke commercial (1979):

Just For Fun , ,

Is Bob Castellini Like Billy Mays?

27. January 2009  - Published by Jimmy Dinsmore

Reds' majority owner Bob Castellini took to the airwaves last week to "promote" the Reds caravan, but he was really there trying to explain why the Reds have been stagnant in the hot stove offseason (again). This time (as opposed to the other times) Castellini sounded convincing when he told WLW's Bill Cunningham that the current Reds team, as it is made up now, will be in it to the end, barring major injuries. This isn't an unbelievable statement. They are certainly much younger, faster and more athletic. The defense is improved and, if Aaron Harang returns to form, they will have a solid pitching staff (assuming Cueto and Volquez continue to progress). But the average Reds fan knew this already and they didn't need to hear yet another appeal from Castellini because frankly it's becoming quite a tiring act.

It seems the Reds should just hire Billy Mays, the noted pitchman, to buy local air time and let him do his thing instead of the boring Castellini who is more suited to real estate and produce. "Hi, Billy Mays here for the Cincinnati Reds. This year's team is younger, more exciting and a real winner. Take it from me (thumbs up)!" Then, in his loud, shrilly voice the bearded pitch man will say, "Buy your season tickets now and we'll throw in these wonderful collector items like a Dave Parker bobblehead, Brandon Phillips commemorative gold gloves (not real gold of course), and the limited edition Joey Votto first base glove, which turns into a left fielder's glove in 2010. Take it from me, these items are special. Alone, they're a $500 value, but order your tickets now and you'll get it all. Cincinnati Reds baseball. Come paint the town red (thumbs up and cheesy smile)." 

Remember, when Castellini took over the Reds he promised a winner, almost immediately. That didn't happen. Then he fired Wayne Krivsky and uttered those famous words, "We're just not going to lose any more." Well Bob, you did. On Cunningham's show, he backtracked from that "we're not gonna lose anymore" line by saying he meant they weren't going to have a loser attitude any more. I guess Krivsky is a real sour puss? Hard to be a successful GM when you're working for someone like Castellini who talks a big game, but then doesn't do what it takes to win. But heck, he's enthusiastic. Just like the aforementioned Billy Mays. And just like Billy Mays, the product Castellini is hocking is a piece of crap too. 

MLB , , , , , , ,

Gottfried Out; Old SEC Foe In?

27. January 2009  - Published by Adam Bartel

With Alabama men's basketball head coach Mark Gottfried resigning Monday after 10+ seasons, under very unusual circumstances, the focus - as always - now shifts to his eventual successor.  As contractually obligated, all speculation immediately begins with Gonzaga head man Mark Few (who isn't going anywhere) and Memphis' John Calipari (who would probably go if the money was big enough).  But there's one name that keeps popping up that strikes me as more than a bit odd: former UK (and current Minnesota) head coach Tubby Smith.

This seemed like a random report initially when the AP threw his name in a quick summary article about the firing of Gottfried.  But it turns out they didn't just pull this out of thin air.  The Birmingham Times ran a column that insinuated that Tubby was the preferred choice of the Crimson Tide boosters if/when Gottfried was displaced, and the Bama Sports Report lists him as one of the two favorites for the job, along with VCU's Anthony Grant.  Additionally, The Big Lead notes that former UK athletic director and former Alabama head coach C.M. Newton (who hired Tubby at UK) likely will have a fairly large say in the selection of Gottfried's replacement.

Now, the immediate question is why would Tubby want a job back in the SEC, less than two years after fleeing Lexington?  Well, for one, the pressure for a basketball coach to succeed at Alabama isn't anything close to that of a Kentucky leader.  That pressure seemed to be the primary reason to want to leave UK.  He might also miss the (usually, except for this season) higher quality of competition that the SEC provides over the Big Ten.  And, even though 'Bama hoops doesn't compare to the importance of the football squad, it's still more revered and respected than Minnesota basketball.

Having said that, Tubby may be quite comfortable as a Golden Gopher: he's got five years left on a $13M contract, and the expectations of him aren't in any way outrageous.  That, in and of itself, might be enough to deter him from looking elsewhere.

This may all be much ado about nothing, but it seems like more than a coincidence that a name like Tubby's, which would seem so out of place in a situation like this, keeps appearing over and over again.  Worth watching.

(h/t The Big Lead for doing the heavy lifting)

College Hoops , ,

2009 Fantasy Football Top 50

25. January 2009  - Published by Dan Clasgens

The 2008 fantasy season in the books and there are plenty of questions that need to be answered, but nonetheless here's the 1st edition of the 2009 GSI Fantasy Football Top 50 rankings:



TOP TEN PICKS
1. ADRIAN PETERSON (MIN) - The winner by default. A-Pete won the rushing title and 16 TD's is hard to beat. He may not be the best overall RB in the NFL, but he remains fantasy football's best. The fact he still has room for improvement is scary.

2. STEVEN JACKSON (STL) - When he played, Jackson was one of the best scorers in fantasy football. In fact he finished the year in the top 3 of fantasy points per game. The problem is he only played in 12 games and was less than 100% in half of those. New Rams coach Steve Spagnuolo says his offensive philosophy is to "to be able to run the football and protect the quarterback." That should spell success for the Rams' franchise back.

3. MATT FORTE (CHI) - Having a top five pick is not what it used to be, but you can't go wrong taking the Bears' newest weapon there. He has the ability to catch the ball out of the backfield and can break big plays. The Bears' offense will continue to focus on giving him opportunities.

4. MAURICE JONES-DREW (JCK) - Fred Taylor's days in Jacksonville appear to be over, leaving the bulk of the duty to MJD. He shined down the stretch with Taylor sidelined and now could have the chance to do so for the length of a season. He not only is rock solid at the goalline, but Jones-Drew also is one of the best receiving backs in the league.

5. CHRIS JOHNSON (TEN) - The rookie was sensational, picking up right where he left off in college at making explosive plays. If it weren't for the touchdown machine Lendale White stealing his chances at the stripe, Johnson would rival A-Pete for the #1 pick.

6. MICHAEL TURNER (ATL) - The best free-agent pickup during last year's off-season won't make it past Round 1 in 2009. He finished second in the league in rushing and put up four mutliple-TD games. Throw in a score in 7 of his last 8 games in '08 and his value is high. I am a bit worried about his 370 carries this year though as he could wear down.

7. LARRY FITZGERALD (ARZ) - Fitz has moved to the top of my list at receiver with his dominating playoff performance. He is as solid as they come and a safe bet to be near the top of the league again next year. Through three playoff games Fitzgerald is up to 419 receiving yards, 23 catches, and five touchdowns. That's following six scores in his last five regular season games. Pretty impressive. Getting quarterback Kurt Warner back could prove key though to him going this high.

8. FRANK GORE (SF) - I am still holding out for Gore to follow up on the 2006 campaign. To do so he's going to need to avoid all the bumps and bruises though. With Mike Singletary back and Mike Martz gone in San Fran, expect Gore to become the center of attention in the 49ers' attack (even more so than before).

9. DEANGELO WILLIAMS (CAR) - Even with Jonathan Stewart lurking, Williams was able to put up some amazing numbers this season in the high-powered Panthers' running attack.  He made 20 trips to the end zone and rushed for 1,518 yards. A repeat performance may be tough, but he's certainly worth top 10 recognition.

10. ANDRE JOHNSON (HOU) - Johnson makes my top 10 and is really 1A on my Cheat Sheet at receiver heading into next season.  It's pretty impressive to think about only six running backs had more yards than Johnson did through the air. That's enough for me to take him in late in the first round.

COMPLETE RANKINGS

Fantasy Football , , , , , , , , , , , ,

10 Reasons Cardinals Can Win

25. January 2009  - Published by Dan Clasgens

The Steelers are the favorites to win the Super Bowl, but Rotoworld.com's Gregg Rosenthal offers up some reasons the Cards can win:

1. Kurt Warner makes quick decisions.

2. They can win the turnover battle.

3. The Cardinals have the most dominant player in the game.

4. They have speed over the middle.

5. The Steelers aren't unbeatable with a lead.

6. The Cardinals can confuse the Steelers offensive line.

7. The Cardinals are at their best when things look worse. 

8. Arizona has their own Troy Polamalu.

9. Head coach Ken Whisenhunt and Offensive line coach Russ Grimm know the Steelers well.

10. No upset is too great. 

COMPLETE ARTICLE

NFL , , ,

Controversy In San Diego?

24. January 2009  - Published by Dan Clasgens

from ProFootballTalk.com:

On Wednesday, Chargers running back LaDainian Tomlinson posted the following message on his personal web site:  “I have been getting a lot of messages on my site regarding me leaving San Diego.  I feel that I need to make it very clear that I have no intentions of leaving San Diego.  San Diego is where my career started and where I’d like it to end.  I have nothing but love and the upmost respect for this team, the players, and the Spanos Family.  Me being traded is completely out of my hands.  I have ABSOLUTELY no control in that decision making.  All I can do is wait and see how it all plays out.  As for now, I am a Charger and will be until I am told otherwise.”

Informed of the statement from L.T., Chargers G.M. A.J. Smith didn’t take the typical, “We respect LaDainian and everything he’s done for the organization” approach.

Instead, Smith mocked Tomlinson.

“My first reaction was we both have similar feelings,” Smith said, according to Kevin Acee of the San Diego Union-Tribune.  “I have no intentions of leaving San Diego.  San Diego is where my GM career started and where I’d like it to end.  I also have nothing but love and the utmost respect for this team, the players and the Spanos family.  I have absolutely no control over how long I will be with the Chargers.”

NFL , ,