Home > MLB

Hamilton Dealt to Rangers

22. December 2007  - Published by Dan Clasgens
The Reds sent outfielder Josh Hamilton to Texas late Friday afternoon in exchange for two pitchers. Hamilton, who turns 27 in May, hit .292 with a .922 on-base-plus-slugging average in 90 games. He also hit 19 homers and drove in 47 runs. However, with a surplus of outfielders, the Reds considered him expendable.

Still, it is interesting to see what Hamilton's market value really is. I was hoping it would be more than a pair of prospects.

In exchange for the former No. 1 overall pick and last year's Rule 5 draft pick, the Reds received Edinson Volquez and Danny Ray Herrera.

Volquez was the Rangers minor league pitcher of the year last season. He was sent to Class A Bakersfield to start the year last season under a strict rebuilding plan designed by director of player development Scott Servais. After a seven-start tutorial there, he went 14-2 at Double-A Frisco and Triple-A Oklahoma to earn a September callup. He was 2-1 with a 4.50 ERA. The Reds say that he pitches in the mid-90's, but can sprinkle in pitches as fast as 97 MPH from time to time.

Herrera was a 2006 draft pick out of the University of New Mexico. He is a small, but crafty left-handed best suited for relief and Reds' GM Wayne Krivsky said, "He is a finesse left-hander with a good screwball and a good guy to add to our inventory of minor-league pitchers."

What this trade really says is that the Reds are ready to put minor league sensation Jay Bruce in centerfield. It should be interesting to see if that actually comes to frutition.

He now probably becomes the team's center fielder, although Krivsky said, "We'll have good competition with Bruce, Dickerson, Hopper and Freel. Manager Dusty Baker will sort it all out in spring training."

Personally, I like Hamilton and being what his contract is it seems that trading Adam Dunn or Ken Griffey Jr. would have given the Reds a better opportunity to improve the roster. Both of them have much more tape to get through to make a trade. Something tells me the Reds aren't sold on Hamilton's longevity and at the end of the day that is why this deal was made.

Does this mean there's nothing still in the works for ace Erik Bedard? Not necessarily, but don't hold your breath waiting for a deal to happen. The Baltimore Sun is reporting that Bedard likely will not be dealt by Opening Day

MLB ,

Comments

Keith
Keith
12/27/2007 12:00:00 PM #
Josh Hamilton added a spark offensively and defensively, especially when Freel was out. I hate to see him go, but obviously we need the pitching help.
12/30/2007 5:38:59 PM #
It is just disappointing to see the Reds get cautious about going after something better.
1/1/2008 9:26:29 PM #
Hamilton did provide a spark, but the fact that the Reds turn a small investment into two pitchers is good for me.  We'll see how it pans out.  Hopefully at least one of them can become a good starter.
1/1/2008 10:20:24 PM #
Herrera has no chance to start. The guy is nothing more than a junk pitcher. It's pretty scary for me to think about him pitching at GABP on a hot, humid July evening.

The deal breaker clearly is Volquez. He has potential, but is far from a given thing. Hamilton is a middle of the order guy with one of the best arms in baseball and has the ability to play all three outfield positions. Reds fans already know all too well that outfielders are worth much on the trade market. Look at what little in return Austin Kearns and shortstop Felipe Lopez yielded the Reds.

Regardless of how this trade winds up, the Reds really need to add a veteran, reliable starting pitcher to rotation.
1/2/2008 12:55:24 PM #
I liked the trade. People overvalued Hamilton. He played 90 games. Seemed to be injury prone and was expendable. I loved his story and if we could've kept him, fine. I agree, I'd rather have seen Griffey dealt, but that just wasn't going to happen. So, why not acquire another young arm with potential. You can't have enough of those. There are more Josh Hamiltons out there, than pitchers like Volquez.
1/2/2008 1:52:38 PM #
The Reds actually did well in this deal.  I understand the whole "Hamilton should have been worth more" argument.  But reality is that the market really wasn't valuing him at more.

Remember, this is a guy who has had a serious drug problem.  Most scouts believe that his body will always been injury prone because of the many years of drug abuse that he put it through.  And I can't really disagree with them there.

On top of that, this was his first full season in the bigs.  He has no track record to market when trading him.  No general manager in their right mind is going to fork over even a proven No. 3 guy for a player with a small sampling size, serious drug history, and injury concerns for the rest of his career.

Also remember that it isn't like Hamilton is still 22, 23-yrs. old making his MLB debut this year.  He is 26.

Reds got good enough value for him.  
1/2/2008 7:29:41 PM #
I also  like the trade.  Not big on the throw-in reliever, but snagging a young commodity like Volquez is pretty good.  Trading strength for weakness is good.

Sure, we didn't rob the Rangers blind, but both sides gave up significant talent to make it happen.  Sure, Volquez has limited experience in the majors, but Hamilton's 90 MLB games isn't that much more.
1/2/2008 7:44:55 PM #
We are all really saying the same thing - outfielders are a dime a dozen. If that is the case though why not trade Jay Bruce for a young, established front line starter like Eric Bedard?
1/19/2009 4:01:11 AM #
I loved his story and if we could've kept him, fine. I agree, I'd rather have seen Griffey dealt, but that just wasn't going to happen.
1/26/2009 5:40:17 AM #
The deal breaker clearly is Volquez. He has potential, but is far from a given thing. Hamilton is a middle of the order guy with one of the best arms in baseball and has the ability to play all three outfield positions.
Comments are closed