The biggest problem at the Sprint Cup race in Fontana, California last week wasn't the rain fiasco; it was the large number of empty seats. This problem is nothing new  to the track either. Since the Auto Club Speedway opened, attendance has been lower than expected and it is clear it isn't getting better. Maybe the track should cut down to one race, maybe they shouldn't race in California the same weekend as the Oscar's, maybe they shouldn't hold a race there a week before the Las Vegas race or just maybe the area doesn't want a track. Whatever the reason for the poor attendance, major changes could be on the way to address the problem.

Gillian Zucker, president of the speedway, announced that possible reconfiguration of the track is being discussed with the goal of creating a two-mile restrictor plate track. The process would be extremely expensive (upwards of $10 million) with additional banking and new soft walls needing to be installed, but the hope is that the tight racing that has made Daytona and Talladega famous will save the floundering attendance figures.

Zucker said that the idea of creating a third plate track on the Sprint Cup schedule came from Michael Waltrip, which isn't a shock considering all four of his career wins have come on plate tracks. Most drivers don't like giant, multi-car wrecks, so I imagine Mikey is in the minorty on this proposal, but the fans might think otherwise.

Personally, I don't want to see another plate track. Plate racing is geared toward the fans that only watch the end of a race and those that tune in the hopes of seeing a big wreck, neither of which I really care about anyway. At plate tracks, drivers can cruise around in last place, half a lap behind the leaders and charge to thr front with 20 to go. It makes 90% of the race meaningless. Adjustments are minimal at best, and good equipment and pure luck trump actual driver ability and strategy. Why do you think Mikey has four wins at plate tracks and hasn't even sniffed victory lane at any other track?

I like tracks where every lap matters and cars can be adjusted and go from the back to the front and vice versa. California has that already, and it isn't a bad race to watch. There was plenty of two-wide racing in last weeks event, Carl Edwards made a nice late-race charge past Jeff Gordon and Jimmie Johnson to win and Kyle Busch must have passed 100 cars.

I don't think the problem is the track configuration, but if track officials are determined to make a change they should go with something original. Leave major differences in the banking between each set of corners or make drastic progressive banking to create even more racing grooves. Give the fans soemthing they have never seen. Going from a duplicate track of Michigan to a duplicate track of Daytona and Talladage, isn't a very revolutionary idea. 

NASCAR auto club speedway, restrictor plate track